Paul Waldman | August 8, 2007
Visiting the site of the Minneapolis bridge collapse on Saturday, President Bush used the opportunity to get in a standard-issue Republican dig on government -- you know, the entity in charge of things like making sure bridges are safe. "There's a lot of paperwork involved with government," he said, promising to "cut through that paperwork, and to see if we can't get this bridge rebuilt in a way that not only expedites the flow of traffic, but in a way that can stand the test of time."
But don't expect too much. "I make no promises on the timetable," the president then said, bringing down the mood a bit. He did, though, go on to say that the tragedy might lead to something positive. A pledge from his administration to push for greater investment in infrastructure, perhaps? Or a promise to repair crumbling roads, bridges, and utilities? Fat chance.
If big government is to blame for its failure to act on these problems, what on earth would make anyone believe that throwing even more big government at the problems will solve them?
ReplyDeleteI mean, the argument here is that government failed, right?
This is one of the basic fallacies of the argument that more government is a solution to social issues.