An Inconvenient Truth About Lincoln (That You Won't Hear from Hollywood)
By Lynn Stuart Parramore
November 20, 2012 | Over this Thanksgiving week, you may find yourself in a movie theater watching Steven Spielberg’s treatment of Abraham Lincoln and the battle to pass the 13th Amerndment, which abolished slavery once and for all. There’s much to be said for Lincoln [3]: marvelous acting, less mythologizing than usual, and a fascinating window into raucous realpolitik. Spielberg’s film stands several cuts above any movie depiction of the Lincoln presidency you’re likely to see.
Lincoln himself stands several cuts above the vast majority
of U.S. presidents. After some equivocating, he freed the slaves, a
monumental undertaking that was a service to the
country and to humanity in general. He was also friendlier to workers
than most presidents, an affinity noted by Karl Marx, who exchanged
letters with Lincoln leading up to and during the Civil War. (You won’t
see the GOP acknowledging that!)
But there’s a side of Lincoln that no Hollywood film shows clearly: He was extremely close to the railway barons, the most powerful corporate titans of the era.
But there’s a side of Lincoln that no Hollywood film shows clearly: He was extremely close to the railway barons, the most powerful corporate titans of the era.
No comments:
Post a Comment