One of the striking elements of the demonization of Cyprus was how it
was depicted as a willing tool of Russian money launderers and
oligarchs. Never mind the fact, as we pointed out, that Cyprus is
not a tax haven but a low-tax jurisdiction,
and in stark contrast with the Caymans and Malta, has double-taxation
treaties signed with 46 nations and has (now more likely had) with six
more being ratified. Nor is it much of a tax secrecy jurisdiction,
according to the Financial Secrecy Index. Confusingly, in the overall
ranking, lower numbers are worse (Switzerland as number 1 is the baaadest) but in the secrecy score used to derive the
rankings,
higher is worse, with 100 being utterly opaque. The total rank is a
function of “badness” (secrecy score) and weight (amount of
business
done). You’ll notice that all the countries ranked as worse than Cyprus
have secrecy scores more unfavorable than it, with the exception of
Germany, which is a mere 1 point out of 100 less bad, and the UK, which
scores considerably lower (Nicholas Shaxson, author of Treasure Islands,
would take issue with that reading, but he takes a more inclusive view
of the boundaries of a financial services industry. For the UK, thus he
not only includes the “state within a state” of the City of London, but
also the UK’s secrecy jurisdictions, such as the Isle of Man, in his dim
view of the UK as well as the US on secrecy). And even so, its greater
volume of hidden activity gives it a much worse overall ranking. Of countries 21 tp 30, only 3 rank as less bad on secrecy: Canada, India, and South Korea.
No comments:
Post a Comment